Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2519 (GAU)

SMTI PARVATI JALAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

WP(C)/1048/2025 · 2026-03-08

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010015642026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No.: WP(C)/1048/2025 SMTI PARVATI JALAN WIFE OF RAMESH JALAN HEREIN REPRESENTED BY HER APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHRI CHANDAN KALITA AGED ABOUT - 37 YEARS SON OF SRI BANESWAR KALITA R/O MIRZA GUWAHAHTI IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP 781T25 ASSAM. 2: M/S SANDEEP COMMERCIALS PVT LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHRI CHANDAN KALITA AGED ABOUT - 37 YEARS SON OF SRI BANESWAR KALITA R/O MIRZA GUWAHAHTI IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP 781125 ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI ASSAM. PIN - 781 006. 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Page No.# 2/4 AMINGAON O/O THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AMINGAON KAMRUP R ASSAM 3:THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) RANGIA O/O THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL)RANGIA ASSAM 4:THE OFFICE OF THE CIRCLE OFFICE RANGIA REVENUE CIRCLE KAMRUP ASSAM 5:THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER RANGIA OFFICE OF THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER KAMRUP R ASSAM 6:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE RANGIA POLICE STATION KAMRUP R ASSAM For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. D. Deka, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. N. Bordoloi, Advocate Mr. H. Sarrmah, Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 09.03.2026 Heard Mr. B. D. Deka, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Ms. N. Bordoloi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Revenue and Disaster Management Department and Mr. H. Sarmah, the learned counsel appears on Page No.# 3/4 behalf of the District Administration. 2. The petitioner herein has approached this Court seeking directions upon the respondent Nos.2, 3 & 4 to consider the representation dated 05.09.2024 and to carry out demarcation of the subject land of the petitioner in a time-bound manner. It is seen that in pursuance to the notice being issued by this Court on 28.02.2025 and the orders passed on 23.05.2025 and 18.07.2025, demarcation was carried out by the Land Revenue Authorities in respect to Dag Nos.403, 431, 432, 436, 435, 433, 399, and 434 of KP Patta Nos.147, 11, 122, 95, 107, 125, 143 and 94 belonging to village Bhatkuchi under Panduri Mouza of Rangia Revenue Circle. 3. Mr. H. Sarmah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 to 6 has placed before this Court the revised report in pursuance to the order passed by this Court on 18.07.2025 wherein details have been given pertaining to the demarcation carried out on 08.09.2025. It is also seen that along with the said communication, various other documents have been enclosed therein which are collectively kept on record and marked with the letter “X”. 4. Taking into account that the demarcation proceedings has already been carried out which was the relief sought for in the Page No.# 4/4 writ petition, nothing further remains in the instant proceedings. 5. The parties herein would be at liberty to take certified copies of the communication dated 22.10.2025 along with the enclosures thereto which are collectively kept on record and marked with the letter “X” from the Registry of this Court. 6. The writ petition accordingly stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant