[2025:RJ-JP:32611] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11031/2025 1. Ramavtar Swami S/o Dhoona Ram Swami, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dhani Bori, Village Bhuri Bharaj, Tehsil Paota, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. 2. Sumitra Swami D/o Mool Chand Swami, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Dhani Bori, Village Bhuri Bharaj, Tehsil Paota, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajastahn, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kotputli- Behror 4. The Principal Medical Officer, Govt. B.d.m. District Hospital, Kotputli, District Kotputli- Behror. 5. The District Collector, Kotputli- Behror. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 20/08/2025 Although, in the writ petition, it is prayed that the respondents be directed to continue services of the petitioners, the Pharmacist appointed on urgent temporary basis; but, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they would feel contended if they are permitted to submit representation(s) with the respondents to consider their case in the light of an order of a [2025:RJ-JP:32611] (2 of 3) [CW-11031/2025] coordinate Bench of this Court dated 27.05.2025 passed in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.11074/2025. In the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra), this Court observed as under:- “Be that as it may, the petitioners may file their representation(s) with the concerned Chief Medical and Health Officers for redressal of their grievances. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider engagement/continuous of the petitioners on the post of Pharmacist, in case they feel that the services of the petitioners are required by them. The present writ petitions stand disposed of, accordingly. The stay applications also stand disposed of, accordingly.” Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:- “(i) The petitioners are at liberty to submit representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. [2025:RJ-JP:32611] (3 of 3) [CW-11031/2025] (ii) The respondents are directed to consider the representation(s) within a period of twelve weeks from the date of its receipt in the light of observation made by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra).” Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/66