Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25186 (KAR)

SUNIL KUMAR A.R v. THE MANAGER

MFA/3224/2016 · 2025-09-13

Lok Adalath

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:11995 MFA No. 3224 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3224 OF 2016(MV-I) BETWEEN: SUNIL KUMAR.A.R. S/O RAME GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, RESIDING AT, NEAR NANJUNDESHWARA TEMPLE, I.P.NAGAR, LAGGERE, BANGALORE. ALSO AT 764, AMACHALLI, K.R.PET TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 436. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. N.KUMAR., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE MANAGER, FUTURA GENERAL INDIA, INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, PARADENA NO.18/1 (OLD NO.125/A), 3RD FLOOR, ASHOKA PILLAR ROAD, I BLOCK, JAYANAGAR. BANGALORE-560 011. 2. CHIKKA YELLAPPA S/O KAKAPPA, # 87/2, DOMMASANDRA, VIRGO NAGAR, BIDRAHALLI POST, BANGALORE-560 049. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:11995 MFA No. 3224 of 2016 (BY SRI. B.C.SHIVANNE GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2-DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED:22.11.2017) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:09.11.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.3284/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, PRINCIPAL MACT, BANGALORE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 04.03.2024, 11.03.2024 and 20.03.2024 on these days, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. The appeal is listed today. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:11995 MFA No. 3224 of 2016 appeal. Hence, the Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32