APHC010355622018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Pydipati Venkata Vijaya Kumar. The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A PADMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER:- The instant Writ Petition is filed India for the following relief: “to issue a Writ of Mandamus passing a resolution dated 16. the petitioner till the age of 60 years by issuing retirement notice at the age of 58 years as illegal, improper and arbitrary IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16650 OF 2018 Pydipati Venkata Vijaya Kumar. AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) following: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents b passing a resolution dated 16.02.2018 and unanimously agreed to continue the petitioner till the age of 60 years by issuing retirement notice at the age of improper and arbitrary and pass such other orders”. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) under Article 226 of the Constitution of declaring the action of respondents by agreed to continue the petitioner till the age of 60 years by issuing retirement notice at the age of and pass such other orders”. 2. Heard Smt. Akella Padma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Co-operation for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the respondent authorities has complied with the interim order passed by this Court vide order dated 02.05.2018 and also the petitioner has retired from service on reaching superannuation. In view of the same, the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Co-operation for the respondents is in attendance. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs 6. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.03.2025 KK