[2025:RJ-JP:28782] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9423/2025 1. Prakaram Singh @ Vishnu Singh S/o Shri Shyam Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Jaisinghpura, P.s. Phulera, District Jaipur At Present Tenant At Aditya Vihar, Bhagwati Nagar, P.s. Kardhani Jaipur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). 2. Deep Singh @ Raj S/o Devi Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Kishanpura, P.s. Chaksu, District Jaipur At Present R/o House No. 71, Poonam Market Panchyawala, P.s. Karni Vihar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Kumar Naharwal Mr. Anil Kumar Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/07/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant bail application qua accused-petitioner No.2 namely Deep Singh @ Raj S/o Devi Singh with liberty to renew the prayer of bail after filing of result of investigation. 2. Permission sought for is granted. 3. Accordingly, this bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn qua accused-petitioner No.2 namely Deep Singh @ Raj S/o Devi Singh with liberty as prayed for. [2025:RJ-JP:28782] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9423/2025] 4. So far as the accused-petitioner No.1 namely Prakaram Singh @ Vishnu Singh is concerned, he has filed the instant bail application under Section 483 of BNSS. The petitioner is in custody in connection with FIR No.452/2025 registered at Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur West (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2) & 126(2) of BNS. Investigation is being conducted in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 126(2), 281, 125(a) & 3(5) of BNS. 5. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that as per medical report of the injured, four injuries have been found on the person of the injured out of which two injuries are grievous in nature. He submits that both grievous injuries are found on non-vital part of the body of the injured. Petitioners is in custody since his date of arrest & trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 7. I have considered the contentions. 8. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the nature of injuries; trial will take time in its conclusion; absence of criminal antecedents as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:28782] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9423/2025] 9. This bail application is accordingly partly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Prakaram Singh @ Vishnu Singh S/o Shri Shyam Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 10. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /C-1