Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25183 (JHR)

KIRAN ASHA SINHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/898/2024 · 2025-01-09

S N Pathak

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 898 of 2024 ---------- Kiran Asha Sinha, w/o. late Vishwamohan Kumar Sinha, r/o. Village Husaina, P.O. Husaina, P.S. and Dist. Nalanda (Bihar), presently residing at C/o. Priyaranjan Patel, 34, Navneet Colony, Hanuman Nagar, Kankarbag, Patna (Bihar). … … Petitioners - V E R S U S – 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sri Prashant Kumar, the Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, At. Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Dist. Ranchi. 3. Sri Upendra Kumar Sinha, Under Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, At. Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Dist. Ranchi. 4. Sri Niwas Prasad, Superintending Engineer, Kharkai Nahar Anchal, Adityapur, Jamshepdur, PO & PS. Jamshedpur, Dist. East Singhbhum. 5. Sri Shiv Ram Gagrai, Executive Engineer, Minor Distribution Division No. 9, Ghatshila Camp, Galudih, P.O. & P.S. Ghatshila, Dist. Singhbhum East. 6. Sri Raj Kumar Agrwal, the Principal Accountant General (A&E), Jharkhand, At. Doranda, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Dist. Ranchi. …….. Opp. Parties. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Shashi Shekhar Dwivedi, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Suresh Kumar, SC(L&C)-II Ms. Richa Sanchita, Advocate ---------- 04/ 09.01.2025 Heard the parties. It has been very fairly submitted by learned counsel for the opposite parties that the order of this Court has already been complied with and averment to that effect has been made in para-5 of the show-cause dated 23.11.2024 filed by the opposite party No. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the same. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) kunal