Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25183 (AP)

VADDE SREEKANTH v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/18201/2025 · 2025-08-03

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010355632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18201/2025 Between: 1. VADDE SREEKANTH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEAR S/O. VADDEADINARAYANA, H.NO.22/292-C, ANKALAMMA STREET, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH - 515801 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI. GUNTUR DISTRICT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, GUNTAKAL RURAL PS, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 5. KURUVA SHANKAR, , S/O. K. MASTHANAPPA, D. NO. 22/292/A/21, ANKALAMMA STREET, GUNTAKAL-515801. ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 6. KURUVA ESWARAIAH, S/O. K. VASIKERAPPA, D.NO.22/292, ANKALAMMA STREET, GUNTAKAL-515801. ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 7. P VINOD, S/O. P. GURU PRASAD, D.NO. 18/295, ACS MILL AREA, GUNTAKAL-515801. 8. V LAKSHMI DEVI, , W/O. V. ANJANEYULU, D.NO.22/292-A, OPP TO ANKALAMMA TEMPLE, GUNTAKAL-515801. 9. M RAMESH, S/O. RAMANJANEYULU, D.NO. 2-27, AKULEDU- 515731, SINGANAMALA MANDALAM, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 10. M SREENIVASULU, S/O. RAMANJANEYULU D. N0.2-27-A, AKULEDU-515731, SINGANAMALA MANDALAM, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 11. M GOVINDU, S/O. RAMANJANEYULU D.NO. 2-27-A, AKULEDU- 515731, SINGANAMALA MANDALAM, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus a Declaring the inaction of 4th Respondent in not registering the Petitioner s Complaint dated 06.05.2025 and not taking steps prevent unlawful interference by Respondents No.5 to 11 as illegal arbitrary and violative of Article 14 21 of the Constitution of India b Direct the 4 Respondent to take immediate action on the representation dated 06.05.2025 and to provide Police Protection to the Petitioners for safeguarding their peaceful possession and cultivation over the land in Sy.No.41 to an extent of Ac5.01 Cents of Donimukkala Village, Guntakal Mandal Ananthapuramu District.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that there are civil disputes between the parties and the grievance of the petitioner may be redressed before the competent Court. Hence, the petition may be disposed of. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:04.08.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18201 of 2025 Dt.04.08.2025 Asr