1 2025:CGHC:23793 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2817 of 2025 Gul E Rana Tazin Khan W/o Irfan Ui Rahim Khan Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Lohrabode, Tehsil Masturi, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) Through Power Of Attorney Holder Devdutt Sahu S/o Late Sant Ram Sahu Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Lohrabode, Tehsil Masturi , District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Portection Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Block - 2 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan , Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Collector Of District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Tehsil Pachpedi District - Bilaspur, Chahttisgarh 5 - Sewa Sehkari Samiti Maryadit Dhurvakari Registration No. 576, Procurement Center Namely Dhurvakari Tehsil Pachpedi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Anand Mohan Tiwari, Advocate For State-Respondents : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 13/06/2025 2 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following relief(s) : “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be hold that the "invalid" status on the Petitioner's Khasra Nos. 52, 54, 74, 117, 189, 190, 191, 328, 362, 173, and 399 in the Farmer Registration Integrated Portal as unlawful, and direct the Respondents to correct the records to reflect valid ownership/lease. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the Respondents to carry forward the Petitioner's registration for Kharif 2024-25 and allow her to sell paddy without further delay. 10.3 This Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the Respondents to pay compensation to the Petitioner for financial losses incurred due to the inability to sell paddy, with 12% annual interest from the date of loss. 10.4 This Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the Respondents to audit and rectify technical glitches in the portal to prevent future disruptions for the Petitioner or other farmers. 3 10.5 This Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the Respondents to expeditiously decide the Petitioner's representation dated 17.12.2024 (Annexure P/5), which has been pending without justification. 10.6 This Hon'ble Court may kindly Award litigation costs to the Petitioner for the Respondents' wilful inaction. 10.7 Any other relief/reliefs, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, along with the costs of the petition, may also please be granted to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the limited grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has made a representation Annexure P-6 before the respondent/s which is still pending and the same has not been decided yet, therefore, it is prayed that this writ petition may be disposed of giving liberty to petitioner to make a fresh representation before respondents and in-turn respondents may also be directed to consider and decide the said fresh representation within stipulated time fixed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the State-respondent not oppose the above limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and perused record with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the facts of the case and submission made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage by giving liberty to petitioner to make a fresh representation before respondent authorities within ‘15 days’ from today and in-turn respondent authorities are directed to consider and decide the said representation expeditiously preferably within an outer limit of '120 days' from the date of receipt of copy of this order, in accordance with relevant rules, regulations and law. Certified copy as per rules Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant