Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2518 (ALL)

VEER BAHADUR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/22393/2025 · 2026-04-19

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22393 of 2025 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant, today in the Court, is taken on record. Heard Shri Yogesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Arimardan Yadav, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 75 of 2025, 316(5), 318(4), 351(2), 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Hariparvat, District Agra during the pendency of the trial before the Court below. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the accused-applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case crime number. It is contended that the applicant has been languishing in jail since 19.04.2025. Learned counsel further submits that, in pursuance of the order dated 26.02.2026 passed by this Court, the applicant has deposited the entire outstanding amount of Rs. 1,66,000/- in the account of the first informant. A copy of the receipt dated 16.03.2026 in this regard has been annexed as Annexure No. SA-1 to the supplementary affidavit. It is also submitted that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Noor Muhammad, Yogesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Veer Bahadur .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) there is no likelihood of the applicant absconding or tampering with evidence in case he is released on bail. Accordingly, it is prayed that the applicant be enlarged on bail. Learned AGA has not disputed the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Veer Bahadur, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co- operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. April 20, 2026 Vibha Singh BAIL No. 22393 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad