Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25170 (GAU)

SMTI GEETIKA BARMAN v. PATHSALA MUNICIPAL BOARD AND 4 ORS.

WP(C)/6501/2025 · 2025-11-16

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010247852025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6501/2025 SMTI GEETIKA BARMAN W/O DEVEN CHANDRA BARMAN, R/O PATHSALA TOWN, WARD NO- 1, MAUZA- SARIHA, P.S.- PATHSALA, DIST- BAJALI, ASSAM, PIN-781325 VERSUS PATHSALA MUNICIPAL BOARD AND 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, PATHSALA, BAJALI. PIN 781325 2:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER PATHSALA MUNICIPAL BOARD PATHSALA BAJALI PIN-781325 3:THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DISTRICT OFFICE BARPETA PIN-781301 4:SANJIB CHOUDHURY S/O LT. LABANYA CHOUDHURY PATHSALA TOWN SARIKA MAUZA P.S.- PATHSALA DIST- BAJALI ASSAM PIN-781325 5:AMARJYOTI DAS PATHSALA TOWN SARIKA MAUZA Page No.# 2/2 P.S.- PATHSALA DIST- BAJALI ASSAM PIN-78132 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K DAS, A BHARADWAJ,C SAIKIA,S J DUTTA,MS Z ANJUM,MS D DAS,MS. B CHETRY Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 17-11-2025 Mr. M.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after the impugned Notice dated 26.09.2025, a subsequent notice has been issued on 13.11.2025 which is to be assailed afresh. Mr. Das has submitted that in view of subsequent development, the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty, to file afresh. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant