Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25159 (PNJ)

SUBHASAH INFRAENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. GURUGRAM METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ARB/99/2025 · 2025-09-12

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ARB-99-2025 (O&M) -1- 208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB-99-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.09.2025 SUBHASH INFRAENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS GURUGRAM METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present:- Mr. B. K. Goel, Advocate and Mr. Sajal Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. (Through Video Conferencing) Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for the respondent. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, who has joined the proceedings through video conferencing, has submitted that the prayer in the present petition is for appointment of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 2. Both the learned counsels for the parties have jointly submitted that during the pendency of the present petition, a proposal was made by the petitioner for appointment of a Sole Arbitrator and vide letter dated 26.08.2025, the petitioner suggested a penal of two Arbitrators and now vide letter dated 04.09.2025, the respondent has accepted one of proposed names and has CHETAN THAKUR 2025.09.15 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. ARB-99-2025 (O&M) -2- already appointed Dr. B. S. Singla, Former Chief General Manager, Technical, NHAI as the Sole Arbitrator and therefore, the present petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous. 3. Ordered accordingly. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) 12.09.2025 JUDGE Chetan Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No CHETAN THAKUR 2025.09.15 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.