AHSAN RAZA ALIAS BASAR ALIAS BASAR RAI ALIAS AHASAN RAJA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8996/2025 · 2025-09-25
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25151 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25151 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:30403 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8996 of 2025
---------
Ahsan Raza @ Basar @ Basar Rai @ Ahasan Raja
... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
... … Opposite Party
---------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
---------
For the Petitioner : Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, A.P.P.
---------
04/25.09.2025
Heard Md. Zaid Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, learned A.P.P. for the State.
The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected thrice in B.A. No. 1960 of 2023, B.A. No. 11241 of 2023 and B.A. No. 10391 of 2024.
Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since
23.11.2022. It has further been submitted that two of the co- accused who had taken part in the abduction and commission of rape namely, Saddam Hussain and Md. Arif have been convicted but they have been granted bail in their respective appeals.
Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
It appears that Saddam Hussain and Md. Arif have been granted bail in appeals they have preferred against the
judgment of conviction on account of the fact that they have spent seven years in custody. So far as the present petitioner is concerned, he is in custody since 23.11.2022. There is a specific allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons of abducting the informant and committing rape upon her along with the other co-accused persons.
Regard being had to the above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. This application accordingly stands rejected once again.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
A. Sanga/-