Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS No.752 of 2015 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner appeared through video conferencing.
2. Mr. B.S. Negi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for respondent no.1.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that the writ petition has rendered infructuous for the reason that the order impugned in the present writ petition dated 24.01.2015 was passed in Civil Appeal No.13 of 2014, Divya Yog Mandir Trust vs. Baldev and others. The said Civil Appeal No.13 of 2014 has been decided in terms of compromise entered into between the parties by the judgment and order dated 20.09.2022 passed by learned First Additional District Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar.
4. In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is rendered infructuous and accordingly dismissed as such.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
12.09.2025 Ravi