2025:JHHC:16280 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 316 of 2025 1. Chandrashekhar Prasad, Aged 90 years, (Ex-University Professor), Son of Late Shiv Prasad, Resident House No. 12, Gandhi Road, Old Sonari, P.O. and P.S. Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East. 2. Smt. Kalawati Devi, aged about 79 years, w/o late Tribhuwan Ojha @ Tribhuwan Jha, resident of House No. D/94, A Block, Khutadih, Sonari, P.O. and P.S. Jamshedpur, Dist- Singhbhum East 3. Smt. Dulari Devi, aged about 83 years, wife of Late Rabindra Nath Singh, Resident of L/2 - 60, Kulsi Road, P.O. and P.S. Sakchi, Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East. 4. Manzoor Ahmad, Aged 80 years, Son of Late Nayeem Ahmad, Resident of House No. 30, Road No.7, Azad Nagar, Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S. -Mango, District- Singhbhum East 5. Nasreen, Aged 90 years; Wife of Late Prof. Manzar Shahab, Resident of Ex-5/3, Vatika Green Valley, Pardih road, Azad Nagar, Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S. Mango District Singhbhum East, … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Ramniwas Yadav, son of not known to the petitioners, Director, Department of Higher, Technical Education and Skill Development, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. Prof. Ajit Kumar Sinha, son of not known to the petitioners, Vice- Chancellor, Ranchi University, Ranchi P.O. GPO-1, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi 4. Dr. Md. Reyaz, son of not known to the petitioners, Principal, Karim City College, Jamshedpur, Sakchi, P.O. and P.S. Mango, District Singhbhum East. … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. A. Allam, Senior Advocate : Ms. Sushmita Kumari, Advocate : Mr. Faisal Allam, Advocate : Ms. Asfia Sultana, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Amit Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, AC to GA I --- 09/20.06.2025 This petition has been filed against the opposite parties for non- compliance of the order dated 15.05.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 424 of 2023. 2. The learned counsels for the opposite parties have submitted that the order of this Court has been complied. He submits that the petitioner no.4 has expired and his nominee wife has also expired and 2 therefore succession certificate would be required to remit the amount to the legal heirs and successors of the petitioner no.4. 3. Considering the aforesaid submission, this Court is not inclined to proceed any further in this contempt proceeding, which is hereby dropped. 4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is dismissed as not pressed. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Saurav