Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010137862025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/250/2025 BIDUR CHANDRA RAY SON OF SATISH CHANDRA RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KOIMARI PART VII, PO- KOIMARI, PS- GOLAK GANJ, DISTRICT- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783335. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE DIRECTOR INLAND WATER TRANSPORT ULUBARI ASSAM GUWAHATI-781007 KAMRUP (M) 3:EXECUTIVE ENGINEER INLAND WATER TRANSPORT DIVISION ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007 KAMRUP (M0 4:RAJESH BHAKAT S/O. LT. TRINATH RAI BHAKAT R/O. VILL.- KAIMARI PART-VI P/S. GOLAK GANJ DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783335. Page No.# 2/2 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER AGOMANI REVENUE CIRCLE AGOMANI DIST. DHUBRI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : VIOLISHA KHAKHALARY, C SARMA,MR. P MAHANTA,MS. P SAHARIA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S KATAKI (R4), SR, GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 06.02.2026 (K.R. Surana, J) Upon instructions, Ms. C. Sarma, learned counsel for the appellant, has submitted that during the pendency of this writ appeal, as a fresh tender has been issued, the matter has been rendered infructuous. Ms. M.D. Bora, learned Standing Counsel for the Transport Department, representing respondent nos. 1 to 3, as well as Mr. S. Katakey, learned counsel for respondent no. 4, and Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Addl. Government Advocate appearing for respondent no. 5, have expressed the same view. Resultantly, this appeal stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant