Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25129 (CAL)

MD UNUS v. KAMANASISH SEN SUPDT OF POLICE HOOGHLY RURAL POLICE DIST

CPAN/909/2025 · 2025-07-25

Tirthankar Ghosh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sl.No. 13 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 25.07.2025 CPAN 909 of 2025 Md. Unus -Vs- Kamanasish Sen, S.P., Hooghly Rural Police District With WPA 19716 of 2024 Md. Unus @ Sk. Mohammad Unus -vs- The State of WB & Ors. Ms. R. Sreemani Mr. S. Bank … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Amitabrata Roy, ld. GP Mr. Nilatpal Chatterjee Mr. Shibasish Banerjee … for the State-respondent(s) Re Learned advocate for the applicant contends that so far as the order dated 25.09.2024 is concerned, the police authorities pursuant to the directions passed by this Court has registered three FIRs. However, there has been violation of the order to the extent that the police authorities particularly the Superintendent of Police, Hooghly has failed to comply with the order passed by this Court on 15.02.2023 and 24.04.2023. The police report reflects that there has been no construction at the site referred to by the petitioner and the status quo order passed by the civil court is being maintained. Having regard to the same, I am of the view that the applicant has failed to establish any violation of the order passed by this Court. Appropriate steps be taken before the civil court having jurisdiction over the issue in respect of the accusations made. No interference is called for by this Court. Accordingly, CPAN 909 of 2025 is dismissed. Report so submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)