Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010015082025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/427/2025 MOMIRUL ISLAM SON OF LATE MOKBUL HUSSAIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TANGAON PART-II, P.O.- DHANUA, P.S.- MANKACHAR, DIST.- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 783135. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICIAL DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP(M) HENGRABARI GUWAHATI-36 ASSAM. 4:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE KAMRUP(M) PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-01 ASSAM. 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 6:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE DISPUR POLICE STATION GUWAHATI- 06 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, K ZAMAN,MR. A F N U MOLLAH Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER 17/11/2025 Heard Mr. A F N U Mollah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. M Bhattacharjee, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents. 2. From the materials brought on record, it is seen that police of Dispur Police Station, on receipt of a complaint against the petitioner, herein, had registered the same as Bhagaduttapur O.P. G.D.E. No. 04 dated 01.12.2024. Thereafter, a preliminary investigation as permissible was carried out. The petitioner alleged that his ingress and egress from the property in question was blocked by the police during the period of the said preliminary investigation. However, the said position was disputed by the Officer-in-Charge of Dispur Police Station by way of filing an affidavit. 3. The Officer-in-Charge, Dispur Police Station, vide communication dated 15.11.2025 has apprised Ms. Bhattacharjee, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate that the preliminary investigation initiated in connection with Bhagaduttapur O.P. G.D.E. No. 04 dated 01.12.2024 has since been closed. 4. In view of the closure of the said proceeding, there would arise no further occasion for the police to in any manner prevent the petitioner, herein, from having ingress/egress to the Page No.# 3/3 property in question. 5. The above being the position, no further order is called upon to be passed in the present proceeding and accordingly, the same stands closed. 6. The communication dated 15.11.2025 furnished by Ms. M Bhattacharjee, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, is kept on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. JUDGE Comparing Assistant