[2025:RJ-JP:31127] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9263/2025 1. Sujan Singh S/o Purilal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Jamu- niya, Police Station Ghatoli, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (Presently Confined In District Jail At Jhalawar). 2. Santosh Bai W/o Sujan Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Jamuniya, Police Station Ghatoli, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (Presently Confined In District Jail At Jhalawar). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.109/2025 registered at Police Station Ratlai, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21 & 29 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. Counsel further submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners. Petitioners are in custody since 01.07.2025 and trial will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:31127] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9263/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also the fact that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners- (1) Sujan Singh S/o Purilal & (2) Santosh Bai W/o Sujan Singh shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, the concerned [2025:RJ-JP:31127] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9263/2025] SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /417