Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25110 (AP)

DEVARAPALLI VENKAYAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/18450/2025 · 2025-07-21

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010354372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18450/2025 Between: 1. DEVARAPALLI VENKAYAMMA, W/O RAMAKOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 17-6/2, 24TH WARD, PANDURANGAPURAM, BAPATIA TOWN, BAPATIA DISTRICT 2. KAKUMANU SUBHASHINI,, W/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O AMARAVATI VILLAGE AND POST, GUNTUR DISTRICT, NOW PALNADU DISTRICT 3. KONDAPATURI SRIDEVI,, W/O SRINIVASA CHAKRAVARTHI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 17-6/2, 24TH WARD, PANDURANGAPURAM, BAPATLA TOWN, BAPATIA DISTRICT 4. PESARLANKA VENKATA RAMANA,, W/O SIVARAMA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 17-6/2, 24THWARD, PANDURANGAPURAM, BAPATLA TOWN, BAPATLA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 503 2. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , BAPATLA, BAPATLA 2 DISTRICT.. 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, BAPATLA MANDAL, BAPATLA, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER VRO, 24TH WARD, IMMADISETTYVALIPALEM, BAPATIA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents exclusively the 4th respondent and his staff in trying to interfere the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners property of total extent of Ac 0.40 cents or equivalent to 1936 Sq.yards in D.No. 68/1, West Block No. 17, New Ward No. 24, Old Ward No. 22, Bapatia Municipal Old Ward, nearest Door No. B-17-17 in Chakalipalem, situate in Maraproluvaripalem Village, Bapatla Mandal, Bapatla District without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, violation of under Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and against to the well settled principles of natural justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Sri T.Lakshmi Padmaja, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri B.V.Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents 2 to 5. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents 4 and 5 are interfering with the possession and enjoyment of petitioners’ properties of an 3 extent of Ac.0-40 cents in D.No.68/1, West Block No.17, Maraproluvaripalem Village, Bapatla Mandal and District, without issuing any notice is illegal and arbitrary. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are absolute owners of Ac.0-40 cents in D.No.68/1, West Block No.17, Maraproluvaripalem Village, Bapatla Mandal and District. The staff of the 4th respondent came to the schedule property on 08.07.2025 and 10.07.2025 and tried to dispossess the petitioners without issuing any notice. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions would submit that neither the 4th respondent nor the 5th respondent is trying to dispossess the petitioners. The submission of learned AGP is recorded. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side directing the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with the petitioners’ possession and enjoyment over Ac.0-40 cents in D.No.68/1, West Block No.17, Maraproluvaripalem Village, Bapatla Mandal and District, without following due process. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.07.2025 KA 4 177 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18450/2025 Date: 22.07.2025 KA 5