[2025:RJ-JP:31907] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 22807/2017 Bhanwar Singh S/o Late Shri Baal Singh, R/o 55 Girnar Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through the Additional Chief Secretary Tourism, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation, Paryatan Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Opposite Vidhayak Puri Police Station, Sanjay Marg, M.I. Road, Jaipur- 302001, Rajasthan, India 3. Managing Director, Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation, Paryatan Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Opposite Vidhayak Puri Police Station, Sanjay Marg, M.I. Road, Jaipur- 302001, Rajasthan, India 4. Pradeep Bohra, R/o 60/318, Sector-C, Housing Board Sanganer, Jaipur, Presently Appointed as Consultant General Manager, Operation Office Address Paryatan Bhawan, Opposite Vidhayak Puri Police Station, Sanjay Marg M.I. Road, Jaipur- 302001, Rajasthan, India ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Manjeet Kaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dinesh Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 14/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner has retired from service during the pendency of the writ petition, therefore, the following prayer clauses have become infructuous, which are reproduced as under:- "(i) By issue of appropriate writ, order or direction, the minutes of the 169th meeting dated 29.09.2017 at item No.169.7 may kindly be quashed and set aside being violative of the provisions of law. (ii) By issue of appropriate writ, order or direction the letter/offer of appointment dated 14.11.2017 offering appointment to the respondent No.4 may kindly be quashed and set aside being illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional. (ii-A)By issue of appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 17.11.2017 i.e. Annexure-4 whereby the respondent No.4 has been purportedly given contract appointment on [2025:RJ-JP:31907] (2 of 2) [CW-22807/2017] the post of Consultant General Manager may kindly be quashed and set aside being arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and against the State Government notifications in this regard. (iii) By issue of appropriate writ, order or direction the order dated 24.11.2017 purporting to transfer the petitioner, if already issued may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may be directed to not to transfer the petitioner from Palace on Wheels." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that now only prayer No. (iv) is surviving, which is reproduced as under:- "(iv) By issue of appropriate writ, order or direction the respondent No.1 & 2 may be directed to convene DPC for promotion on the post of Manger and then General Manager and then promote the petitioner against appropriate year of promotion giving him all the consequential benefits." 3. She further submits that in view of the fact that substantial prayers have rendered infructuous and only one prayer No. (iv) is surviving, therefore, she wants to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh writ petition in relation to the prayer No. (iv). 4. Heard. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file afresh writ petition with regard to the surviving prayer No. (iv), as prayed. 6. All interim applications as well as all pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-22