IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15944 of 2024 Decided on: 10th January, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jagdish Chand …..Petitioner Versus H.P. State Forest Development Corporation and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Kiran Dhiman, learned Standing Counsel and Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2 and respondent No.3, respectively. 2. Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 10, 2025 Judge Mukesh