[2025:RJ-JP:34236] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9250/2025 Monu Meena S/o Shri Balveer Prasad Meena, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Nithari, Police Station Dholagarh Devi, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Ramsingh S/o Gulyaram Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Bhanokhar, Police Station Bahatkalan (Dholagarh Devi), District Alwar (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Kumar with Mr. Satyendra Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/08/2025 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.85/2025 registered at Police Station Bahtu Kalan (Devi Dholagarh), District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 308(2), 351(2), 115(2), 127(2) and 140(3) of BNS, 2023. Investigation is being conducted in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 140(3), 308(2), 351(2), 115(2), 127(2) & 140(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment 2015). [2025:RJ-JP:34236] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9250/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that impugned FIR has been lodged against the petitioner on the basis of false allegations. It is submitted that petitioner and complainant are relatives. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that there is serious allegation against the petitioner of demanding ransom. He further submits that Investigation is still going on. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the arguments advanced at bar, especially considering the fact that serious allegation has been levelled against the petitioner and Investigation is going on as well as looking to the nature and gravity of offence, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, this bail application stands dismissed. 6. The observations made hereinabove are only for disposal of the instant bail application and would not prejudice the trial in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /116