[2025:RJ-JP:29937] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9251/2025 Pushpchand @ Arjun S/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Rawantha, Thana Mandana District Kota (Raj.) (At Present Accused Is In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Pushpchand @ Arjun S/o Ramswaroop in FIR No.11/2025 dated 14.01.2025 registered at P.S. Mandana, District – Kota Rural, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Section 80(2) of BNS. 2. The applicant-Pushpchand @ Arjun S/o Ramswaroop was arrested and is in judicial custody since then. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further he submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by [2025:RJ-JP:29937] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9251/2025] the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant(s)-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that only on false report of demand of dowry, a case was registered. He further submitted that as per police investigation, deceased has committed suicide and due to suicide, present petitioner was arrayed as an accused. He further submitted that not a single incident of cruelty for demand of dowry is mentioned by complainant. He further submitted that police has completed the investigation and trial will take time. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 7. On the basis of report lodged by complainant Leelabai, soon after the death of her daughter Jyoti under the suspicious circumstances, the matter is investigated by police. The evidence on record clearly suggest that deceased want to withdraw herself from matrimonial home but accused is forcing her to stay with him. The evidence collected during investigation indicate role of present accused. 8. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, particularly material available on record, I am of [2025:RJ-JP:29937] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9251/2025] considered view that there is no ground to consider release of petitioner on bail at this stage. 9. Accordingly, bail application preferred by petitioner Pushpchand @ Arjun S/o Ramswaroop is hereby dismissed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /363