Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25092 (RAJ)

RUPA KUMARI D/O MADAN LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/11763/2024 · 2025-03-28

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11763/2024 Rupa Kumari D/o Madan Lal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Dhani Karmari, Post Papurana, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education (Headquarter), Jaisalmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr.Aniket Beniwal for Mr.BS Chhaba, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 28/03/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner, while relying upon the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Prahlad Singh Solanki Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.; SB Civil Writ Petition No.1788/2025, decided vide order dated 03rd February, 2025, submits that the present petition may be decided in the light of the aforesaid judgment, as the instant matter is squarely covered by the ratio given therein. Learned counsel for the respondents has raised no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:14335] (2 of 2) [CW-11763/2024] In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the competent authority and respondents are directed to consider the same, within a period of 30 days thereafter, by way of a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, in light of the ratio encapsulated in Prahlad Singh Solanki (supra). Pending applications, if any, shall stand dispose of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Preeti Asopa /192