[2025:RJ-JP:36763] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3819/2023 1. Birdu Balai Son of Shri Bhura Ram, R/o Village And Post Brahmmsinghpur, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar (Raj). 2. Ramesh Chand Son of Late Sh. Dhanna, R/o 43, Agarsen Vihar, Sriram Ki Nangal, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. SHO Police Station, Kanota, District Jaipur. 3. Satish S/o Shri Girdhari, R/o 227, Naya Bagrana, Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4854/2023 Shish Ram Son of Shri Sadhu Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 141, Dhani Johdawali, Barsinghpura, Khandela, Sikar, Rajasthan Village And Post Brahmmsinghpur, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. SHO Police Station, Kanota, District Jaipur. 3. Satish S/o Shri Girdhari, R/o 227, Naya Bagrrana, Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5428/2023 Ramesh Chand Verma Son of Shri Girdhari Lal, R/o Raigor Ka Mohalla, Jamwaramgarh, P.s. Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. SHO Police Station, Kanota, District Jaipur. 3. Satish S/o Shri Girdhari, R/o 227, Naya Bagrana, Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Peush Nag Mr. Sudhir Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Bajrang Lal Choudhary [2025:RJ-JP:36763] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3819/2023] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 10/09/2025 1. In all three petitions, prayer has been made to quash the FIR No. 1049/2019 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) for offences under Section 420, 47, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. 2. It has, inter alia, been stated that FIR in question has already been quashed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 4926/2025 vide order dated 12.08.2025 by way of compromise entered into between parties, hence, prayer for quashing of FIR has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, all three misc. petitions are dismissed as rendered infructuous. 4. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /80-82