Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25087 (CHH)

SHABBIR HUSAIN(APPELL. IN PERSON) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRA/1190/2025 · 2025-08-11

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:40399 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 1190 of 2025 1 - Shabbir Husain (Appellant In Person) S/o Abdul Rehman Aged About 70 Years Sakin Khaparganj, Madarsa Irfaniya Ke Baju, Thana City Kotwali, Bilaspur Tehsil Evam Zila Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Thana Incharge, City Kotwali, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Maulana Mohammad Salim S/o Zahur Khan Aged About 45 Years Sakin Ahad Kitab Ghar, Taiyaba Chowk, Talapara, Thana Civil Line, Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Rubina Khan W/o Maulana Mohammad Salim Aged About 40 Years Sakin Ahad Kitab Ghar, Taiyaba Chowk, Talapara, Thana Civil Line, Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Arbaz S/o Imran Urf Dabbu Aged About 25 Years Sakin Kuber Stationary Shop Ke Samne Khaparganj, Thana City Kotwali, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Afzal Age About 25 Years Sakin Anas Beg House Kuber Stationary Shop Ke Samne Khaparganj, Thana City Kotwali, Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Chhotu Aged About 25 Years Sakin Chhotu Motor Cycle Dukan Kuber Stationary Dukan Ke Samne, Khaparganj, Thana City Kotwali, Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2025.08.13 10:19:09 +0530 2 For Appellant : Mr. Barun Kumar Chakrabarty, Advocate. For State : Ms. Sunita Manikpuri, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 12 / 08 / 2025 1. The present appeal is preferred under Section 380 of BNSS against the order dated 22.01.2025 passed by this Court in CRMP No. 2887/2024, whereby the petition of the appellant has been dismissed. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he wants to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file an appropriate application before the appropriate Bench. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection to this proposition put forth by the counsel for the appellant. 4. In view of the above submission made by the counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu