MD GULAM SABIK ALIAS MD GULAM ANSARI ALIAS MD GULAM SABIR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./5982/2024 · 2025-07-15
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25085 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25085 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:19212 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5982 of 2024 ------ Md. Gulam Sabik @ Md. Gulam Ansari @ Md. Gulam Sabir, son of Md. Gulam Sarvar @ Munna Ansari, resident of village Roushanbag, Asanbani, PO and PS Godda Nagar, District Godda … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Nagma Praveen, D/o Nasimuddin Ansari, W/o Md. Gulam Sabik @ Md. Gulam Ansari, R/s village Roushanbag Asanbani, PO and PS Godda Town, District Godda
… … Opposite Party(s)
With A.B.A. No.6145 of 2024 ------ 1.Md. Gulam Sarvar @ Munna Ansari, son of Md. Ahiya Ansari, resident of village Roushanbag, Asanbani, PO and PS Godda Nagar, District Godda 2.Sanjida Khatoon @ Sanjida Khtoon @ Samjisa Bibi, W/o Md. Gulam Sarvar @ Munna Ansari, resident of vill Roushanbag, Asanbani, PO and PS Godda Nagar, District Godda … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Nagma Praveen, D/o Nasimuddin Ansari, W/o Md. Gulam Sabik @ Md. Gulam Ansari, R/s village Roushanbag Asanbani, PO and PS Godda Town, District Godda
… … Opposite Party(s)
------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P.
Mr. V. K. Sinha, APP For the OP No. 2 : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate ----- 10/ 15.07.2025 Heard the parties.
2. These anticipatory bail applications under Sections 482 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 85/109/352/ 351(2) /351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
2025:JHHC:19212 2
3. Both the parties submits that they have entered into a settlement.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed the terms of settlement.
5. The said settlement is taken on record.
6. Considering the said submission, this Court finds it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. It is expected that the settlement which has been entered into between the parties will be strictly honoured and complied with by both the parties.
7. Accordingly, these Anticipatory Bail Applications stand allowed. The petitioners, above named, are directed to surrender before the learned court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on the event of their surrender or arrest, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda, in connection with Godda (T) P.S. Case No.183 of 2024, subject to the condition that one of the bailers should be a close relative of the petitioner and other should be a resident of State of Jharkhand, having sufficient landed property in his/her name or in the name of his/her ancestors in which he/she is having share and to that effect, he/she has to file an affidavit before the Trial Court indicating his/her share in the property.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3