APHC010354582020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1279/2020 Between: 1. MANDA JANARDHANA RAO, S/O MATHAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, HINDU, OCC. FARMER RESIDENT OF ANGALAKUDURU (V), TENALI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. MANDA SAMSONU, S/O MATHAIAH HINDU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. EX-SERVICEMAN (RETIRED EMPLOYEE) RIO H.NO.6-35, NEAR GOVT. HOSPITAL MAIN ROAD, EMANI VILLAGE, DUGGIRALA MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, ANGALAKUDURU PANCHAYAT, ANGALAKUDURU VILLAGE TENALI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the dismissal order in 1.A No.302/2020 in AS No.116/2019, dated 20-11-2010 on the file of the Court of XI Addl District Judge, Tenali and allow the said petition in LA No.302/2020 in A.S No.116/2019 on the file of the Court XI Addl District Judge, Tenali and grant stay of all the proceedings including delivery of the suit schedule property in E.P No.25/2020 in 0.S No.389/2015 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tenali and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in E.P No.25/2020 in 0.S No.389/2015 on the file of the Hob'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tenali by suspending the operation of the order dated 20-11-2020 in 1.A No.302/2020 in A.S No.116/2019 passed by the Hon'ble XI Addl. District Judge, Tenali, pending the above Civil Revision Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GHANTA SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K H V SIVA KUMAR The Court made the following: The Court made the following ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that the petitioner do not want to prosecute the present revision petition. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR 09.07.2025 LSP 55 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1279/2020 09.07.2025 LSP