[2025:RJ-JP:34233] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9241/2025 Tasleem S/o Mahsingh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Mahsingh Ka Bas Nangal Tappa, Police Station Bagad Tiraya, District Alwar. (At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.204/2025 registered at Police Station Bagad Tiraya, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 319(2) & 316(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is a young boy, aged about 21 years and he is in [2025:RJ-JP:34233] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9241/2025] custody since 23.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that there is allegation against the petitioner of committing cyber fraud. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Tasleem S/o Mahsingh shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the [2025:RJ-JP:34233] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9241/2025] concerned police station in first week of every month, till trial is concluded. It is further directed that petitioner shall share his mobile number (in use) to the trial court and concerned Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall not change his mobile number and not switch off his mobile phone. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /113