Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2508 (GAU)

XXXXXXXX v. XXXXXXXX

I.A.(Civil)/107/2025 · 2026-01-29

Kaushik Goswami, Michael Zothankhuma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010273312024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/107/2025 XXXXXXXX S/O RANJIT KR. NATH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND PO CHANDPUR PART IV, PS BORKHOLA, DIST CACHAR, ASSAM 788110 VERSUS XXXXXXXX W/O SRI RAHUL KR. NATH D/O SRI AMULYA GHOSH, RESIDENT OF ITAKHOLA, E AND D BANDH, NEAR MEDILAND HOSPITAL, PO SILCHAR, PS SILCHAR, DIST CACHAR, ASSAM 788002 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN, MR R I BHUYAN,MS. L WAJEEDA,MR. M H SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : XXXXXXXX VERSUS XXXXXXXX ------------ Advocate for : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN Advocate for : appearing for XXXXXXXX Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 30-01-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. N.H. Mazarbhuiyan, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 5 days in filing the appeal. 2. On considering the fact that notice had been issued to the respondent on 14.02.2025 and as there is no return of A/D card or unserved notice from the sole respondent, we are of the view that the matter regarding condonation of delay should be decided, as the reason given for the same is sufficient for condoning the delay. 3. Accordingly, the delay of 5 days is condoned. 4. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same in the next week. 5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant