Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010266192025 2025:GAU-AS:16516 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2817/2025 BASER ALI S/O LATE AKKEL ALI R/O VILL- BHITOR DUWAR P.S. CHHAYGAON, PIN-781137,DIST.KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S MUNIR, MS. N.A. BEGUM,MR P KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 02-12-2025 Heard Mr. S. Munir, learned counsel for the accused applicant and Mr. K. K. Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused- applicant, namely, Baser Ali, seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with in connection with Chhaygaon P.S. Case No. 306/2025 under Sections 303(2)/317(2) of BNS, 2023. 3. The gist of the allegation against the accused applicant in the FIR lodged by one ASI, Harekrishna Das of Jorshimuli Outpost on 05.11.2025 is that on receipt of secret information that the present accused applicant, Baser Ali, who is a cattle smuggling Mafia has procured some cattle and kept those cattle at Achalpara for smuggling illegally. It is alleged that when the police team went for investigation at the place, 3 cattle were recovered from the backside of the house of one Habibar Rahman, i.e., the other co-accused of the case located at Achalpara and the accused applicant could not submit any valid document for purchasing of those cattle. 4. Mr. Munir, learned counsel for the accused applicant submitted that the accused applicant is not a cattle smuggler and he has been falsely implicated in this case as 3 cattle were recovered from the house of his nephew, namely Habibar Rahman. 5. This Court has considered the materials brought before this Court and also considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the accused applicant as well as the learned Addl. PP, Assam. 6. In consideration of the entire matter, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case, wherein the accused applicant should be granted pre-arrest bail. 7. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant he shall be released forthwith on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with surety of like nature to the satisfaction of the investigating authority, subject to the following Page No.# 3/3 conditions: I. The accused applicant shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of 10 (ten) days from today; II. The accused-applicant shall co-operate with the investigation of the case and II. The accused-applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office. 8. Accordingly, the instant bail application is disposed of as allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant