RABIYA KHATUN ALIAS RABIYA BIBI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND Ors
I.A.(Crl.)/655/2025 · 2025-10-29
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25075 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25075 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010124252025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/655/2025 RABIYA KHATUN ALIAS RABIYA BIBI W/O MD. AKSED ALI R/O NATUN DEOCHAR P.S. BOKO DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VILL- MOIRAPUR, P.S.PALASHBARI DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM PHONE NO. 9859043615 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND Ors REP BY THE PP ASSAM 2:MD. AKSED ALI S/O LT. KAZIMUDDIN HAJI R/O MOHIMARI P.O. TUKRAPARA P.S.
CHHAYGAON DIST.KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781137 3:SHAHAR BHANU W/O LATE AKSED ALI
R/O MOHIMARI P.O. TUKRAPARA P.S. CHHAYGAON DIST.KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781137 4:SHAH ALOM S/O LATE AKSED ALI
R/O MOHIMARI P.O. TUKRAPARA P.S. CHHAYGAON DIST.KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-78113 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ALI, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 30.10.2025 Heard Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P for the State.
2. Although as per office note neither A/D card nor unserved notice in respect of respondent Nos. 2,3 & 4 have been received back. In consignment/MO tracking report has been submitted indicating otherwise.
3. Having regard to the fact that the present I.A is for impleadment of the opposite parties name therein the service is deemed to be completed.
4. Perused the application for impleadment and heard learned counsels. It appears that the respondent No.2, Aksed Ali has already expired and in his place Shahar Banu, wife of Aksed Ali and Shah Alom, son of Aksed Ali are required to be impleaded.
5. Accordingly, it is directed that the said persons namely, Shahar Banu, wife of Aksed Ali and Shah Alom, son of Aksed Ali be impleaded as respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
6. Necessary changes to the cause-title be made accordingly.
7. Accordingly, the I.A. Stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant