Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30889
Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3901 of 2019 Petitioner :- Bharat Singh @ Bharat Veer Respondent :- Katar Singh Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Dharmendra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Sri Avinash Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the ex-parte decree has already been executed. He further submits that an application under Order IX Rule 13 was filed for recalling the ex-parte decree but the said application was dismissed for want of prosecution. Thereafter, a restoration application was filed which has also been dismissed. Looking to the facts of the case, as the decree has already been executed, the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sri Dharmendra Pratap Singh, Advocate, has appeared for respondent. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad