PRATHIPATI HIMASAMEERA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/18320/2025 · 2025-07-21
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25071 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25071 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010354572025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18320/2025 Between:
1. PRATHIPATI HIMASAMEERA, D/O GOVARDHAN NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, PLOT NO-7, BHAVANI NAGAR, KOVUR, SPS NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 524137 CELL NO 919494008301. 2. PRATHIPATI PRASANNA LAKSHMI, W/O GOVARDHAN NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, PLOT NO-7, BHAVANI NAGAR, KOVUR, SPS NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 524137 CELL NO 919440310167. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BADVEI, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. VAILABHANENI SUDHAKAR, S/O JANARDHAN NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O DOOR NO 14-124,
2
SAI BABA NAGAR,
YARRAGONDAPALEM MANDAL, YARRAGONDAPALEM TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 523327. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No.3 in not considering my representation dated 21.03.2025 submitted to the Respondent No.3 as illegal, arbitrary and amounts to abdication of statutory duties cast up on them and also violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to change the entries from Respondent No.3 to petitioners name in Revenue Records in Survey No. 913, Gunthapalli Village, Badvei Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh an extent of 0.68 Cents and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 3 to consider my representation dated 21.03.2025 submitted to Respondent No.3 pending disposal of writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. VENKATA MOHAN RAO PATHAKOTA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 1 to 4. Notice in respect of the 5th respondent is dispensed with since no adverse order is passed affecting his rights and interests. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners made a representation dated 21.03.2025 (Ex.P.1) to the 3rd respondent
3
regarding rectification of the entries in the Record of Rights. The 3rd respondent issued notice to the petitioner as well as to the 5th respondent. However, the respondents’ authorities have not acted upon the said representation. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions of the Tahsildar, Badvel Mandal, dated 15.07.2025, would submit that the respondents will pass appropriate orders on the representation made by the petitioners as per the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Lands and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971, and the Rules made thereunder. 4. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side directing the 3rd respondent to consider the representation dated 21.03.2025 made by the petitioner keeping in view the judgment reported in J.Krishnamachari vs. State of A.P represented by District Collector1 and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Date: 22.07.2025 KA
1 2014 (1) ALD 406
4
221
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 18320/2025
Date:22.07.2025 KA
5