[2025:RJ-JP:30597] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9230/2025 Smt Urmila W/o Kallu Sharma, R/o Khara Kuaa Ke Pass Jora, Police Station Jora, District Morena, (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Jain, Advocate assisted by Ms. Tanisha Jain, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 07/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Smt Urmila W/o Kallu Sharma in FIR No. 183/2025 dated 03.07.2025 registered at P.S. Mahila Thana (Dholpur), District -Dholpur, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Sections 308(2), 308(7), 308(6), 61(2)(a), 111(3) of BNS. 2. The applicant was arrested and has in judicial custody since 06.07.2025. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is a female and falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that she was exploited by complainant and to [2025:RJ-JP:30597] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9230/2025] suppress her voice, a case has been registered against her. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicants-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicants-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant. 5. Learned counsel for complainant submits that this is a case of honey trap and this accused has trapped the complainant to extort the money. 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 7. The applicant-accused is a female she is in custody since 06.07.2025. The allegations and the counter allegations cannot be decided at the stage of bail and we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and she is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused [2025:RJ-JP:30597] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9230/2025] 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Smt Urmila W/o Kallu Sharma, is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN ),J MONU /256