1st Sept.,2025 Item no.M/L 42 Court No. 14 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 12525 of 2024 In the matter of : Kahinur Bewa …. Petitioner VS. Bank of Baroda & Ors. ….Respondents For the Petitioner: Mr. Kamalesh Bhattacharya Mr. Gausul Alam Mr. Ashoke Kumar Nath ….Advocates For the BOB: Mr. Dipanjan Datta Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury ….Advocates For the Respondent nos. 4&5: Mr. Soumalya Ganguli ….Advocate 1. The petitioner inducted the bank as a tenant. For resolution of the contractual dispute between the landlord and the tenant, the petitioner seeks to invoke the writ jurisdiction. 2. The Court is of the opinion that such contractual disputes between the landlord and tenant cannot be decided by the Writ Court. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. 4. It will, however, be open for the petitioner to approach the competent forum in accordance with law, for remedy, if so advised. Page 2 5. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Amrita Sinha, J.)