Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:38143 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No.
2823 of 2025
1 - Santram S/o Phiratram Aged About 54 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34,
Tehsil-
Malkharouda,
Dist.-
Sakti
(C.G) 2 - Hariram S/o Nanki Kahra Aged About 62 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34,
Tehsil-
Malkharouda,
Dist.-
Sakti
(C.G) 3 - Manki W/o Sammelal Aged About 49 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34,
Tehsil-
Malkharouda,
Dist.-
Sakti
(C.G) 4 - Parasmani S/o Ganesh Ram Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34, Tehsil- Malkharouda, Dist.- Sakti (C.G) 5 - Puranlal S/o Dhaniram Aged About 42 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34,
Tehsil-
Malkharouda,
Dist.-
Sakti
(C.G) 6 - Arathram S/o Aghori Aged About 64 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34,
Tehsil-
Malkharouda,
Dist.-
Sakti
(C.G) 7 - Sapuran S/o Govind Manjhi Aged About 74 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34, Tehsil- Malkharouda, Dist.- Sakti (C.G) 8 - Mantoribai W/o Biharilal Aged About 46 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34,
Tehsil-
Malkharouda,
Dist.-
Sakti
(C.G) 9 - Jeevanlal S/o Pyari Marar Aged About 62 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34,
Tehsil-
Malkharouda,
Dist.-
Sakti
(C.G) 10 - Charanlal S/o Janiram Aged About 55 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34,
Tehsil-
Malkharouda,
Dist.-
Sakti
(C.G) 11 - Pramila W/o Ramlal Rawat Aged About 46 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34, Tehsil- Malkharouda, Dist.- Sakti (C.G) 12 - Ramlal S/o Sitaram Rawat Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34, Tehsil- Malkharouda, Dist.- Sakti (C.G) 13 - Heeraram Marar S/o Sadhram Marar Aged About 62 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34, Tehsil- Malkharouda, Dist.- Sakti (C.G)
2 14 - Sonauram Marar S/o Paharu Marar Aged About 51 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34, Tehsil- Malkharouda, Dist.- Sakti (C.G) 15 - Teras Ram S/o Bedram Aged About 53 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34,
Tehsil-
Malkharouda,
Dist.-
Sakti
(C.G) 16 - Garib Das S/o Lalit Marar Aged About 70 Years R/o Village- Mirouni, P.H.N.-34, Tehsil- Malkharouda, Dist.- Sakti (C.G)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2
-The
Collector
Sakti,
District
Sakti
(C.G.) 3 - Land Acquisition Officer Cum Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Malkharoda,
District
Sakti
(C.G.) 4 - Executive Engineer Water Resources Division, Janjgir, District Sakti Headquarters- Champa, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Satish Gupta, GA with Mr.
Rishabh Bisen, PL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge
Order on Board 01.08.2025
1. With the consent of the parties, matter is heard finally.
2. This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the concerned respondent- authority to give proper compensation to the petitioner as per relevant rules/policy.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be
disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent-authority to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner
3 Annexure P-2 in accordance with relevant rules/law within specified time.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/State submits that if the application/representation of the petitioner is still pending before the concerned authority, the same will be decided in accordance with the relevant law/rules expeditiously.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. Considering facts of the case, above submissions of counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage permitting the petitioner to file fresh detailed application/representation with all relevant documents before respondent No.3 raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition within '15 days' from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If such representation is filed by petitioner, respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with relevant rules/law/regulation. CC as per rules. Sd/-
Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma)
Judge J/-