MD. ASLAM ALIAS TANTU ALIAS ASLAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./227/2025 · 2025-03-10
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2505 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2505 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 227 of 2025
Md. Aslam @ Tantu @ Aslam, aged about 38 years, S/o Md. Mombaiya, R/o
Haldipokhar, near Purani Masjit, P.O. & P.S. Kowali Town-Jamshedpur,
District-East Singhbhum
….
…. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
….
.… Opp. Party
-----------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Naveen Kumar Gaunjhu, A.P.P.
-----------
Order No. 02/ dated 10.03.2025
Heard the parties.
2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kowali P.S. Case No. 16 of 2023, corresponding to G.R. No. 1163 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 147,148,149,153(A), 295A,341,323,325,333,353,505/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur.
3. On 31.03.2023 at about 05:00 p.m., 40-50 persons of a particular community stopped Ram Navmi procession near Haldi Pokhar. When the police party reached there, they were also roughed up. The mob also pelted stones on the police party and members of Ram Navmi procession.
4. From the case diary, it appears that the petitioner was identified as one of the accused in CCTV camera, which was installed at the place of occurrence.
5. It appears that Bail Application of co-accused Sheikh Parvez @ Maina @ S.K.Parvej has been rejected by this Court vide order dated 06.03.2025 in B.A.No. 11007 of 2024 with direction to renew his prayer for bail after three months.
6. Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that some of the co-accused persons, namely, Raj Mohammad @ Raja @ Nepali @ M.D. Raj and Md. Danish have been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A.No. 6710 of 2023 vide order dated 06.10.2023 and in B.A.No. 7025 of 2923 vide order dated 06.10.2023 respectively.
2
7. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected at this stage.
8. The petitioner, if so, advised may renew his prayer for bail after three months.
(Ambuj Nath, J)
P.KS.
Uploaded