IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1011 of 2025 Date of Decision: 23.09.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Vinod Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 22.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that relief sought by the petitioner in CWP No.10493 of 2025 has been granted. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid communication as well as office order dated September, 2025, this Court finds merit in the afore contention of learned Additional Advocate General and respondents, after having considered the case of the petitioner in light of Ghanshyam Dass and Mohit Sharma’s cases, have been granted due and admissible benefits. 2 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. September 23, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil) Judge