[2025:RJ-JP:29932] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9204/2025 Sunil S/o Shri Jeevan Ram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ward No. 2, Goriya, Ps Ranoli, District Sikar (Raj.) (Accused In District Jail, Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sampati Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Sunil S/o Shri Jeevan Ram in FIR No.109/2025 dated 31.05.2025 registered at P.S. Gokulpyura, District - Sikar, whereby the applicant- accused has charged under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 109(1), 351(3), 189(2) of BNS. 2. The applicant-Sunil S/o Shri Jeevan Ram was arrested and is in judicial custody since then. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further she submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by [2025:RJ-JP:29932] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9204/2025] the Investigating Agency for investigation. She further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. She also submitted that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is an innocent person and he is falsely implicated. She further submitted that investigation is complete and charge-sheet has been filed and copy of charge-sheet is filed by her. She further submitted that there is no report to show that any injury sustained by injured Mahendra Singh was found as dangerous to life. She further submitted that grievous injury sustained by Mahendra Singh is only on non-vital parts. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 7. On the basis of Parchabayan of injured Mahendra Sigh, about assault in the evening of 30.05.2025 by unknown 4-5 persons, a report was registered and during investigation, petitioner was taken in custody after production warrant and charge-sheet has been filed against him with other accused. Total 9 injuries were suffered by injured and out of 9 injuries, injury Nos. 7 and 9 were found as grievous but others were found as simple. The order of trial court indicated that only one case No.111/2025 at P.S. Ranoli was [2025:RJ-JP:29932] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9204/2025] registered against the petitioner and other accused Gograj is having criminal background. Injury No.6 is on perennial region and the report indicated that it requires re- consideration though there is no such report available on record. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused Sunil S/o Shri Jeevan Ram. 9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Sunil S/o Shri Jeevan Ram is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused Sunil S/o Shri Jeevan Ram is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of ₹25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall mark his attendance at concerned police station on every first and third Monday of every month till disposal of case. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (iii) The applicant accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. [2025:RJ-JP:29932] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9204/2025] (iv) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (v) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /358