Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2504 (KAR)

SMT. GANGAVVA W/O. RAMAPPA UAGALWAT, v. SMT. MUDIYAWWA W/O. YALLAPPA UAGALWAT,

RFA/100335/2024 · 2026-08-19

C M Poonacha

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 29th DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE.HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR RFA NO 100335 OF 2024(PAR/POS) BETWEEN 1 . SMT. GANGAVVA W/O. RAMAPPA UAGALWAT, AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. TEGI, TQ. GULEDAGUDDA, DIST. BAGALKOT. AND OTHERS APPELLANTS (By Sri. S R HEGDE AND ASSOCIATES) AND 1 . SMT. MUDIYAWWA W/O. YALLAPPA UAGALWAT, AGE. 60 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. TEGI, TQ. GULEDAGUDDA, DIST. BAGALKOT. AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.08.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.55/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, BADAMI, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. 2 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R Four weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 25.03.2025. The advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court as per the Court Order dated 29.01.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. C- By:- pla T- By: -ran