1 2025:CGHC:25569 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3030 of 2025 1 - Sundar Sai Jangde S/o Shri Puniram Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Bade Sipat, Tehsil Malkharouda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary/ Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Office Of The Collector, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (R)/ Land Acquisition Officer Sub Division Malkharouda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar, Office Of The Tahsildar, Malkharouda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 5 - Halka Patwari No. 25 Inspector Of Revenue Division / Tahsil Malkharouda, Office Of The Tahsildar, Malkharoda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 6 - Public Works Department District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 19/06/2025 1. With the consent of the parties, the present matter is heard finally. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but aggrieved with the action initiated by the respondent authorities, who have acquired land for the purpose of C.G. State Road Development Project (ADB Project) from Jaijepur-Malkharouda- Gobarbhata road in which Petitioner’s lands situated at Village Charpara, P.H.N. 25 Tahsil Malkharouda District-Sakti and the proposal for compensation has been passed by the Collector but till date no compensation has been paid to the petitioner. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have made several representation/application before the respondent authority but the respondent authority has not considered and decide the representation moved by the present petitioner hence the petitioners have no any alternative or efficacious remedy except to approach before this Hon’ble Court. 4. Learned Counsel for the respondent submits that Collector (Land acquisition branch), District- Janjgir-Champa C.G. has sent a proposal letter no. dated 15.11.2022 to the petitioner for payment of Rs. 10,75,200/- as compensation but the petitioner did not took any action in this regard. 5. It is an admitted fact that the land of the petitioner bearing Khasra No. 271/1, Rakba 0.0240 hectare was acquired for the purpose of C.G. State 3 Road Development Project (ADB project) from Jai-jaipur Malkharouda, Gobarbhata. Also, the Collector (Land acquisition branch), District- Janjgir-Champa C.G. has sent a proposal letter no. dated 15.11.2022 to the petitioner for payment of Rs. 10,75,200/- as compensation but the petitioner did not took any action in this regard. 6. Therefore, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the limited prayer of the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall file a fresh detailed representation along with all relevant documents and copy of this order before the respondent no. 3 and the respondent no. 3 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within an outer limit of 90 days from the date of filing of the representation. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima