APHC010353702020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23522/2020 Between: 1. GURIJALA CHENNAMMA, FATHER NAME LATE GURIJALA VENKATAIAH OCC.HOUSE WIFE, 9-94C, COLLEGE ROAD, MARKAPUR-523316, PRAKASAM DIST. ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOMAROL POLICE STATION 5. DHAMMU THIRUPATHI, BEDUSUPALLY VILLAGE, KOMAROL MANDALAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 6. DHAMMU OBULAMMA, BEDUSUPALLY VILLAGE, KOMAROL MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. SMT VENKATA LAXMAMMA, BEDUSUPALLY VILLAGE, KOMAROL MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 deleting the Sec. 304-B of I.P.C. in Crime No. 71 of 2020 on the file of Respondent No. 4 Police Station by diluting the investigation to help the unofficial respondents is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Criminal procedure code and consequently direct the respondent no-2 to entrust the investigation to the any other investigating agency other then the Respondent No. 4 for ends of Justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no-2 to entrust the investigation to the any other investigating agency other then the Respondent No. 4 for ends of Justice pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T D PANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 deleting the Sec. 304-B of I.P.C. in Crime No. 71 of 2020 on the file of Respondent No. 4 Police Station by diluting the investigation to help the unofficial respondents is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Criminal procedure code and consequently direct the respondent no-2 to entrust the investigation to the any other investigating agency other then the Respondent No. 4 for ends of Justice and pass...…” 2. Heard Sri T.D.Phani Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 02.09.2025 MH 4 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 22 W.P.No.23522 of 2020 Dated.02.09.2025 MH