IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14379 of 2025 Date of Decision: 09.10.2025 _______________________________________________________ Ms. Reena Kumari …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Mr. Naresh Kumar Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Having taken note of the fact that petitioner has not completed normal tenure of posting at CHC Bhawarna, there appears to be no justification to interfere with the impugned transfer order, however, having taken note of the fact that private respondent No.4, who was actually transferred in place of petitioner to Bhawarna, has been working at CHC, Rehan for more than 20 years, coupled with the fact that one post of Chief Pharmacy Officer is lying vacant at Nurpur, this Court without going into the merits of the case, deems it 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 fit to dispose of the present petition, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file representation to the competent authority for her adjustment at Nurpur, within a period of one week, which in turn, shall be decided by the competent authority expeditiously, preferably within a period of ten days. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if she still remains aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Interim order, if any, is vacated. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge October 09,2025 (shankar)