Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010230862025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3343/2025 MOHOR ALI S/O. MD. HASEN ALI, R/O. VILL.- NADIKA, P/S. LALUK, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE, PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HASAN, MR. I K BURAGOHAIN,MR. A HASAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 04.11.2025 Heard Mr. N. Hasan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. N. Das, learned Addl. P.P., Assam for the State respondent. 2. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner namely, Mohor Ali under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking regular bail in connection Page No.# 2/3 with PRC Case No.410/2025 under Sections 61(2)/316(2)/318(4)/178/179/180 of BNS, 2023 (Corresponding to North Lakhimpur P.S. Case No.309/2024). 3. Brief of the case is that on 11.07.2024 complainant namely, Bania Tapum of Arunachal Pradesh had lodged an ejahar at North Lakhimpur P.S. stating that approximately one month ago, he got phone calls from numbers 9394619343, 9394419567 and 9957343627, who offered him a fake currency deal, promising Rs.8,00,000/-(Rupees eight lakh) in exchange of Rs.1,50,000/- (one lakh fifty thousand). Later on, the complainant contacted Lakhimpur police and make a pan to catch the persons involve in the illegal business. Accordingly, the accused persons fixed a place and called the complainant to NH-15 By-pass, Lakhimpur and when the accused persons namely, Ahidur Rahman and Sabar Ali came to exchange the fake currency with real money; police had caught the accused persons red handed with the fake currency. 4. The other co-accused persons including the main accused namely Ahidur Rahman and Sabar Ali have already been granted bail and orders in this respect have been annexed to the instant petition. 5. On perusal of the TCR, it appears that the present petitioner is not an FIR named accused and he was arrested on the basis of the statement of co-accused and no other material has been brought to notice. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and the period of detention of 118 days as well as the fact that the investigation has been completed by filing a Charge-sheet, further detention of the petitioner is not considered necessary. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court/Elaka Magistrate in connection with the aforementioned case. 8. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused petitioner – Page No.# 3/3 (1) shall appear regularly at the trial, it any and (2) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. 9. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant