APHC010352742020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 23469/2020 Between: 1. KASINA SRINIVASA REDDY, S/o.PITCHIREDDY, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC: TAILORING, R/O.DOOR NO.26-17-159/A, 2 LANE, ANKAMMANAGAR, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARUNDELPET POLICE STATION, ARUNDELPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SAYYAD ALLABHAKSHU, S/O.RASOOL, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.FLAT NO.201, MAHENDRA ENCLAVE APARTMENT, 4TH LANE, SVN COLONY, GUJJANAGUNDLA, GUNTUR. 5. NALLURI KOTESWARA RAO, S/O.BUTCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.DOOR NO.41-21-56/9, 2ND LANE, KRISHNA NAGAR, GUNTUR. 6. MARRI SURESH BABU, S/O SINGARAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.26-33-16, 7TH LANE, A.T. AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR. 7. NUVVULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 1/4, 1ST LANE, VIDYA NAGAR, GUNTUR. 8. YARLAGADDA RAVI, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O.DOOR NO., G.M.C.NO.229, 3RD LANE, RAJENDRA NAGAR, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the 2 matter of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 police in not registering the FIR basing on the complaint made by the petitioner dated 07.09.2020 against the accused is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the law and procedure as contemplated under the law and in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent police to register a crime basing on the complaint dated 07.09.2020 given by the petitioner and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “....to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the matter of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 police in not registering the FIR basing on the complaint made by the petitioner dated 07.09.2020 against the accused is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the law and procedure as contemplated under the law and in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent police to register a crime basing on the complaint dated 07.09.2020 given by the petitioner and to pass ...” Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the grievance of the Petitioner is that the police did not register the complaint of the Petitioner and that this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions would submit that the subject matter relates to civil disputes between the parties and hence, no crime is registered and this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. 3 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 23469 of 2020 04.09.2025 Mjl /*