APHC010353592021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1066/2021 Between: Smt. B.vijayamma, ...PETITIONER AND T Srirarnulu and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M SIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S PARINEETA The Court made the following: 2 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1066 of 2021 ORDER:- This Revision Petition is filed questioning the order dated 20.03.2020 in I.A.No.35 of 2019 in I.A.No.1004 of 2014 in O.S.No.233 of 2014 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Palamaner, Chittoor District. 2. Petitioner is the plaintiff. Suit was filed for permanent injunction against the Respondents from interfering with their schedule property. Schedule property is a house site of an extent of Ac.0.04 cents located in Sy.No.307/2 of Mamadugu Revenue Village, Gangavaram Mandal, Chittoor District. 3. Along with the said suit, the Petitioner filed I.A.No.1004 of 2014 for temporary injunction pending disposal of the suit. The trial Court initially granted ad-interim injunction and the same was made absolute on 18.10.2018. 4. As the defendants were interfering with the possession of the schedule property, the Petitioner filed I.A.No.35 of 2019 to direct S.H.O., Gangavaram Mandal to render police protection to 3 protect his right and to implement the orders of temporary injunction granted in her favour. The said application was dismissed on the ground that there is no proof of threat was shown by the Petitioner for granting Police protection. Hence, the revision petition is filed. 5. Heard Sri M.Siva Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Smt. S.Parineeta, learned counsel for the Respondents. 6. After hearing the learned counsel, this Court is of the opinion that as the I.A. was filed in the year 2019, the status as on date is not available, whether police protection is required or not as on date needs fresh consideration. 7. The civil revision petition is therefore disposed of leaving it open to the Petitioner to file an appropriate application before the trial Court, in case there is a requirement of police aid. Thereafter the trial Court shall consider the application and pass appropriate orders thereon. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 09.01.2025 KLP