Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25028 (KAR)

SREEDHARA RAO N G v. STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER

WP/14706/2021 · 2025-01-27

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3599 WP No. 14706 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 14706 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SREEDHARA RAO N.G. S/O LATE K.NARAYANA RAO, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O NO 82, SREE SHANTHI NIKETANA, 9TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, I.U.D.P.LAYOUT, CHITRADURGA-577 501. …PETITIONER (PARTY-IN-PERSON [ABSENT]) AND: 1. STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA INFORAMATION COMMISSION, MAHITHI SOUDHA, DEVARAJ URS ROAD, OPPOSITE TO VIDHANA SOUDHA, WEST GATE, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, AGE: MAJOR, OCCUPATION: EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKA URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BOARD, 2ND STAGE, 5TH CROSS, DHAVALAGIRI EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577 502. 3. S.MOHAN KUMAR AGE: MAJOR, OCCUPATION: CLERK, KARNATAKA URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BOARD, 2ND STAGE, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3599 WP No. 14706 of 2021 5TH CROSS, DHAVALAGIRI EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577 502. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner - party in person is not represented. The petitioner party in person is absent. As could be seen form the daily order sheet, petition was listed on 08.01.2025, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner party in person. Hence, for appearance of the petitioner - party in person, the petition was ordered to be listed on 27.01.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner - party in person is not represented. He is absent. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 16