Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2502 (PNJ)

PARMOD v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANOTHER

RSA/797/2020 · 2026-01-29

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-797-20 IN THE HIG 267 Parmod Municipal C CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent j Courts wher permanent in 2. appeal is yet order dated in filing the 01.05.2025 for today at opportunity arguments. H the case havi 3. has exhibite 2020 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o Versus ipal Corporation and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-plaintiff in s rrent judgments and decrees rendered whereby the suit for declaration nent injunction filed by the plaintiff w The matter pertains to the year l is yet to be issued. Perusal of the ord dated 19.03.2020, notice in the applica ng the present appeal was issued. On 2025 when this case was listed for hea ay at the request of learned proxy cou tunity was granted to learned counsel ents. However, today the appellant ha se having been called twice. A bare reading of the above xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-797-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.01.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA in second appeal against the ndered by both the learned District ation with consequential relief of tiff was dismissed. e year 2020 and notice in the main the order-sheet(s) reveal(s) that vide application for condonation of delay ed. On the last date of hearing i.e. for hearing, the same was adjourned xy counsel for the appellant and last ounsel for the appellant to address ant had gone un-represented despite facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present the trict f of ain vide elay rned last ress pite llant sent RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.30 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-797-20 litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is Court is left prosecution 4. 5. 29.01.2026 rishu 2020 (O&M) -2- It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option except t ution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his uing the present matter. Thus, this cept to dismiss the same for non- any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the the ly his this RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.30 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.