APHC010351912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULyII'^I TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI WRIT PETITION NO: 18006 OF Pn?*; SS ’k-p PRATAPA Between: 1. Jakku Bhargavi, W/o Pulavarthi Bala Chandar, Aged about 46 years, Software professional, R/o D. No. 24C-8-17/1, R.R. Pet, Eluru - 534 001 2. Pulavarthi Bala Chandar, S/o Koteswara r aged about 45 years. Flat No. 101, 2nd floor Bangalore - 560049 3. Jakku Hari Babu, S/o Sanjeeva R/o D. No. 24C-8-17/1, R.R. Pet, Eluru - 534 001 Rao, Software Professional, - , #198, JB Lake Gardenia. rao. Business, aged about 53 years, ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh. Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Home) Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi. Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Sub Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station Eluru, Eluru District 3. Inspector of Police (C.I.), II Town Police Station Eluru, Eluru District 4. Sub Division Police Officer (DSP), (II Town Police Station) Eluru, Eluru District 5. Seera Bhargavi, W/o Seera Ravi Teja, D/o R.V.V. Peddi Raju, Koppula Velama by Caste, Aged about 31 10/2, Ramulu Street, Lambadipeta NTR Distric years. House wife, R/o D. No. 4-23- One town, Vijayawada - 520001, 6. R V V Peddi Raju, S/o not known Employee. R/o D. No. 4-23-10/2. Ramulu Street town. Vijayawada - 520001. NTR District aged about 59 years. Railway Lambadipeta. One ...Respondents Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india praying that in the the High Court may be circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus deciaring the action of the respondents No. 2 to 4 in interfering into the iife and iiberty of the petitioners II Town police station, Eluru and threatening to settle the matrimonial dispute with respondents No. 5 and 6 and demanding to pay the amount of Rs. 15,00.000/- to respondent No. 5 one and calling into the and 6 and creating panic situation and detaining the petitioners in the police station is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of principles of natural justice and also violation Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the and liberty as well as respondent Nos. 2 to 4 not to interfere into the lives matrimonial dispute in between Seera Ravi Teja and Seera Bhargavi in respect of marital disputes and that, not to call them into the police station and not to threaten them and not to settle the matrimonial dispute with respondent pay an amount of Rs. 15,00,000/- to the respondent No. 5 and 6 and not to create panic situation and detain the petitioners into the police station. No. 5 and 6 and not to demand to 1A NOiJOF2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents No. 2 to 4 praying that in the circumstances stated that not to interfere into the lives and as well as in matrimonial disputes of Seera Ravi Teja and Seera Bhargavi and that not to call them into the police station and not to threaten them and not to settle the matrimonial disputes with respondent No. 5 and 6 and not to demand to liberty of the petitioners pay an amount of Rs. 15,00,000/- for the respondent No. 5 and not to create panic situation and detain the petitioners into the police station. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI R K ACHARYULU Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6: — The Court made the following order: APHC010351912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18006/2025 Between: 1.JAKKU BHARGAVI, W/0 PULAVARTHI BALA CHANDAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. SOFTWARE PROFESSIONAL, R/0 D. NO. 24C-8- 17/1, R.R. PET, ELURU - 534 001 2. PULAVARTHI BALA CHANDAR, S/0 KOTESWARA RAO, SOFTWARE professional; AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. FLAT NO. 101,2ND FLOOR, 198, J8 LAKE GARDENIA, BANGALORE - 560049 3.JAKKU HARI BABU, S/O SAMJEEV^ RAO. BUSINESS, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/0 D. NO. 24C-8-17/1, R.R. PET, ELURU - 534 001 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 11 TOWN POLICE STATION ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT 3.INSPECTOR OF POLICE C L, II TOWN POLICE STATION ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT 4.SUB DIVISION POLICE OFFICER DSP, (II TOWN POLICE STATION) ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT 5.SEERA BHARGAVI, W/0 SEERA RAVI TEJA, D/0 R.V.V. PEDDI R.A'U, KOPPUI.A VEl-AMA BY CASTE, AGED ABOUT Jl YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D NO. 4-23-10/2, LAP/! BAD IP ETA, ONE TOWN, VIJAYAWADA - 520001, NTR DISTRIC 6.R V V PEDDI RAJU, S/0 NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, R/O D. NO. 4-23-10/2, RAMULU STREET. LAMBAOlPETA ONE TOWN, ViJA YA\A/ADA - 520G01, NTR DISTRICT ,..RESPOMDENT(S): RAMULU STREET, Counsel' for the IPetit[onnr(S): 1.R KACHARYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2 The Court iriade the toHowing: ORDER: This Writ Petition the follcv/iriQ prayer for; a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No 2 to 4 m interfering Into the life and liberty of the petitioners and ca.hng into the li / own police station, Burn and threatening to settle the matrimonial dispute with respondents No. 5 and 6 and demanding to pay the amount of Rs. 15,00,000/- to respondent No 5 and 6 and creating panic situation and detaining the petitioners in the police station is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of principles of natural justice and also violation Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 not to Interfere into the lives and liberty as well as matrimonial dispute in between Seera Ravi Teja and Seera Bhargavi in respect of marital disputes and that, not to call them Into the police station and not to threaten them and not to settle the matrimonial dispute with respondent No. 5 and 6 and not to demand to pay an amount of Rs. 15,00,000/- to the respondent No. 5 and 6 and not to create panic situation and detain the petitioners into the police station. ’ is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by one Seera Bhargavi, a crime has been registered against the Petitioners and the investigation is going on. For ready reference, the written instructions are extracted hereunder: “Basing on the strength in above report of the complainant. I registered the same as a case In Crime No 148/2025, U/S 85 BNS & Sec 3, 4 of DP Act of Burn il Town PS on 03.07.2025 at 08.15 PM and took up investigation in this case. During course of investigation, visited scene of offence and secured as many as LWs 1 to 5 witnesses in this case and examined them U/S 180(3) BNSS. It Is respectfully submitted that all the allegations leveled by the petitioners herein against respondent police are incorrect, baseless and are misconceived as such the allegations are denied herewith. I submit that the case was registered on 03.07.2025 and it is in Initial stage of Investigation and unless and until, the petitioners/accused , on 3. 3 A.3 to A. 5 will be taken necessary further action as per the allegation which is deemed to fit if the allegation, proved against them. ” Sri R.K.Acharyulu, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that 4. the Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. 5. However, Police are directed to follow due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 15' ^ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary (Home) Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Sub Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station 3. The Inspector of Police (Cl), II Town Police Station 4. The Sub Division Police Officer DSP, Eluru District 5. One CC to Sri R K Acharyulu Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, 7. Two CD Copies Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Eluru, Eluru District Eluru, Eluru District (II Town Police Station) Eluru, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] TF f m HIGH COURT DATED:21/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 18006 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS